Ktistēs as an Honorific Title in Roman Asia Minor
Choose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEPublication date: 06.08.2025
ELECTRUM, 2025, Volume 32, pp. 281-293
https://doi.org/10.4467/20800909EL.25.019.21409Authors
Ktistēs as an Honorific Title in Roman Asia Minor
The term ktistēs, more recent and more polysemous than oikistēs, was nevertheless used in ancient sources to designate the mythological or historical founder of a community. From the first century BC onwards, a new meaning and new contexts of use of this term developed: it became part of the honorific vocabulary used by cities to praise individuals whom they wished to reward or distinguish. As a title officially awarded by civic institutions, it assimilated the person who received it to a new founder. This paper, based on the results of an overall study on the honorific titles attested in Asia Minor during the Roman period, sheds light on the genesis of the title ktistēs, its geographical and chronological distribution, the status of the individuals to whom it was granted and the nature of their action in favour of the community—which, contrary to an old opinion, was not limited to financing constructions.
This paper is based on the results of a larger study published in Heller 2020. All the examples commented here can be found in the online database associated with this publication: https://www.euergetai.univ-tours.fr (accessed on March 24th, 2025).
Benjamin, A. (1963), The Altars of Hadrian in Athens and Hadrian’s Panhellenic Program, Hesperia 32: 57–95.
Boatwright, M. T. (1991), Plancia Magna of Perge: Women’s Roles and Status in Asia Minor, in: S. B. Pomeroy (ed.), Women’s History and Ancient History, Chapell Hill–London: 249–272.
Caneva, S. (2023), The Power of Naming: Studies in the Epicletic Language of Hellenistic Honours, Liège.
Chankowski, A. (1998), La procédure législative à Pergame au Ier s. av. J.-C. : à propos de la chronologie relative des décrets en l’honneurs de Diodoros Pasparos, BCH 122: 159–199.
Heller, A., Suspène, A. (2019), C. Asinius Gallus hagnos à Temnos : la rhétorique civique face au pouvoir romain, in: A. Heller, Chr. Müller and A. Suspène (eds.), Philorhômaios kai philhellèn. Hommage à Jean-Louis Ferrary, Genève: 501–520.
Heller, A. (2020), L’âge d’or des bienfaiteurs. Titres honorifiques et sociétés civiques dans l’Asie Mineure d’époque romaine (Ier s. av. J.-C. – IIIe s. ap. J.-C.), Genève.
Heller, A. (2022), La rhétorique civique face à l’empereur, in: A. Gangloff (ed.), Qualités et vertus de l’empereur dans les inscriptions d’Auguste au début du règne de Constantin. “Miroirs au prince” ?, Leiden–Boston: 48–79.
Heller, A. (2024), L’épigraphie quantitative, in: P. Fröhlich and M. Navarro Caballero (eds.), L’épigraphie au XXIe siècle. Actes du XVIe Congrès international d’épigraphie grecque et latine, Bordeaux: 185–205.
Hepding, H. (1909), Mithridates von Pergamon, MDAI(A) 34: 329–340.
Kuhn, C. (2017), The Refusal of the Highest Honours by Members of the Urban Elite in Roman Asia Minor, in: A. Heller, O. van Nijf (eds.), The Politics of Honour in the Greek Cities of the Roman Empire, Leiden: 199–219.
Leschhorn, W. (1984), “Gründer der Stadt”. Studien zu einem politisch-religiösen Phänomen der griechischen Geschichte, Stuttgart.
Pawlak, M. (2020), Theophanes, Potamon and Mytilene’s Freedom, Electrum 27: 173–188.
Pont, A.-V. (2007), L’empereur “fondateur” : enquête sur les motifs de la reconnaissance civique, REG 120: 526–552.
Robert, L. (1969), Théophane de Mytilène à Constantinople, CRAI: 42–64 (= id., Choix d’écrits, Paris 2007: 603–621).
van Bremen, R. (1996), The Limits of Participation. Women and Civic Life in the Greek East in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods, Amsterdam.
Information: ELECTRUM, 2025, Volume 32, pp. 281-293
Article type: Original scientific article
Tours Centre for the History and Study of Sources (CeTHis),
University of Tours
France
Published at: 06.08.2025
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY 4.0
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
English